Thank you, Mr. Chair.
My point of order is that we've now spent about two hours on a simple subamendment, which, from my understanding, everyone is going to vote for. Ms. Kronis has brilliantly summarized it about 14 times over an hour and a half.
My question for you is this, Mr. Chair: Is there any reason you would see that we would continue to debate for hours something that everybody's in favour of? Or is it just simply that because the rules of Parliament allow it and—