Thank you.
I'm sorry. I completely disagree with that characterization. I would invite the member to listen more closely, because my line of inquiry was not at all about the comments of the Privacy Commissioner. My line of inquiry was about understanding how the subamendment would affect the problem that Mr. Wong has identified, and I was probing that for my benefit, so I reject that premise. I think this is entirely on point, and I'm going to continue with my line of inquiry.
As I understand it, the Privacy Commissioner's amendment is going to sit.... Yes. I have to go back because I have to start my train of thought again since I was interrupted. If you'd like to make an argument, please add yourself to the speaking list.
The Privacy Commissioner's suggestion would limit you because you get to that point where you've written everything you can, to the best of your ability, and you get a bad response or it's not the way the company intends, so you try to have that discussion. Maybe it helps you, but maybe it doesn't. If it's not helpful at that stage, voluntarily, what do you do?