I take the point very well.
Thank you, Mr. Gilkes, for helping me understand that. You don't want to put them in this position where they have to get everything right and, if they miss one thing, they're out of luck and have to redo the process or find it somewhere else. That seems unreasonable to me.
At the same time, I'm concerned with it being so expansive that, as it is currently written, it's all of the subscriber information that relates to any information specified in the order. That's too far on the other side. In the subamendment itself—you could bring it up if you have it before you—I think you're suggesting to me that this is a middle ground. Is that fair, or am I misunderstanding?