To be direct on part 1, from a CSIS perspective, I would say that the tools in part 1 for us are a little bit more limited than they are for law enforcement. The subscriber production order is a law enforcement-only thing. There's no CSIS element or equity in that piece. For us, the element in part 1 that does engage us is the confirmation of service demand.
As has been talked about here and as I have said—but am very happy to repeat because it is an important point—what the confirmation of service demand does for us in a space where we're looking at highest harm investigations, which for us are espionage, foreign interference, terrorism and those sorts of things, is allow us to very quickly take some of those early steps.
Those early steps are, as discussed, when we might have a phone number, and we need to know who is behind that phone number. We need a yes or no to be able to target a warrant or a production order at court. At the end of the day, that is an important tool for us. More generally, the elements that are most important, from an investigative perspective, for CSIS specifically, not for law enforcement, would sit in part 2 of the bill.