In terms of that process, it's interesting, because when Canadians think about the judicial system, they always think about a plaintiff and a defendant, a complainant and a respondent. There's always one side and the other side when you're going to get what we used to think of in plain English as search warrants.
Who argues the other side of the argument in this context? Who makes the argument that the information shouldn't be released, that someone's privacy rights apply or that you could have a charter issue later on in the process?