I hope that the committee will indulge, because this gets to the amendment, but I think your perspective on the amendment is relevant to how we view the subamendment here.
You're of the view that, if we specify a 30-day limit or a 30-day deadline, for lack of a better term, and some service provider, for whatever reason, takes 31 days, your concern is that they may say, “We've already failed to meet this deadline; therefore, there's no point in following through.” Is that the concern?