Yes, Mr. Chair.
BQ‑7 was recommended by the Barreau du Québec, which, once again, finds that the threshold for obtaining subscriber information is too low. The amendment seeks to raise the threshold by using the legal standard of “reasonable grounds to believe” rather than “reasonable grounds to suspect”.
Obviously, I would like an explanation. At this point, is it the beginning or the middle of the investigation?
Could you help me improve my knowledge and give me an example of why you are opposed to the amendment? I imagine you're opposed to it.