I will conclude with the last two questions, then. I've had several, and I've turned them away. I do feel that these are correct to ask because we are asking our law enforcement to believe in what they put in the order. To do so, they have to understand and have confidence in the accuracy of what they're going to be retrieving, and what may or may not happen before they do it. I do think that it does have some relevance to believing, so I will continue.
The United States just demonstrated that it can shut down AI tools used by Canadian service providers overnight, with no notice and by executive order. Canada is asking those same providers to build and maintain permanent interception infrastructure under this bill. What is the government's continuity plan when the tools a service provider depends on are switched off by a foreign government's decision? Does this bill create any obligation to disclose that kind of disruption to the people whose data sits behind it?