You raised an interesting point.
You have both been very articulate in how you have addressed this.
Here is one of my questions and, potentially, a concern. You talked about spectrums of privacy. Obviously, one's body probably attracts the greatest privacy interest. However, with these things here, there's a lot of privacy, because they have all of your details. They're essentially walking biographies of who we are, which, in some cases, people might not want other people to know about. It's things like that. They contain substantial information, so they do attract a high degree of privacy. Even the modules in your car.... There's a B.C. Court of Appeal case about the module that records information for the last three seconds before an accident. These are the types of things for which there is still an expectation of privacy.
On the spectrum of the expectation of privacy that you've just outlined, Mr. Wong, is there agreement, either academic or jurisprudential, on where these issues here, which are covered in this clause and this amendment, stand?