Thanks for that. I think you're agreeing with me.
The government, at least with respect to the confirmation of service demand, did include that very clear marker to say...and it's not just with respect to this that it can be requested. The section doesn't make reference to it being requested. It just says that a demand must not be made if the confirmation would disclose the information.
I think you're quite right that it was made on purpose to signal that this information—medical and solicitor-client privilege—is off limits. I think what we're suggesting is, what is the downside of doing the exact same thing for arguably the more intrusive tool, which is the production order? The confirmation of service demand is certainly less intrusive, we've established, than the production order itself. Why not make that same declaration here that we have that information again out of scope?
