This is for the law enforcement representatives.
Does the fact that we can act quickly—and here we agree that, if we change the requirement in BQ‑5 from “reasonable grounds to suspect” to “reasonable grounds to believe”, we will slow down the proceedings—mean that, in many cases, we won't be able to access the information because the evidentiary threshold will be higher?
Am I correct in saying that several hundred, if not thousand, cases will bypass the judicial proceedings that should be the norm in cases of cybercrime or fraud?