I'm going to have to make an effort to remember that, because we went to Timbuktu and came back via Vladivostok, and now we're returning here.
So let me remind you that BQ‑5 seeks to replace line 27 on page 7 with the phrase “are reasonable grounds to believe” with the phrase “are reasonable grounds to suspect”. One word is being changed.
Then there are two conditions:
(a) an offence has been or will be committed under this Act or any other Act of Parliament; (b) the metadata is in the core provider's possession or control and will assist in the investigation of the offence.
Also, I believe it was Mr. Gilkes who spoke to us about, among other things, a case involving the online sexual exploitation of children. In that case, the amendment to replace “reasonable grounds to suspect” with “reasonable grounds to believe” would require a much higher standard of proof even before the identity is known.
I don't want to assume anything, so I'd like to ask the Royal Canadian Mounted Police officers a question.
Roughly how many crimes or cases of sexual exploitation occur in Canada each year?