No. There is a penalty for not complying with a production order, but if they find that the scope of the production is unreasonable for the time period, they have the ability to object: They won't be able to comply with it.
I think we've talked about this before. There is a bit of a back-and-forth dialogue. The flexibility that's currently built into the law for the judge to set the time is based on that flexibility. For instance, if the RCMP needed information from Rogers, they would talk to Rogers before they had the production order issued. They would come up with a time within which Rogers could provide that information. Depending on whether it's a simple production for subscriber information related to phone numbers, they might be able to do that in two or three days, and that's what they'd ask the judge for.