Here is the question I'm getting at. You've made the case for why you believe it should be reasonable grounds to suspect instead of reasonable grounds to believe for the MLAT process, because all you're asking for—I'm putting “all” in air quotes for that—is the basic subscriber information—not the content of the message. You would ask for the content under the full-blown MLAT process.
When you do the full-blown MLAT process, is the standard currently, before this law comes into place, reasonable grounds to believe, reasonable grounds to suspect or something totally different?