That helps to explain things for me. This has been a really clarifying conversation so far for me.
What you're saying, I think, is that when it comes to this new process that didn't exist before this bill was drafted, the reason you picked the reasonable suspicion standard as opposed to the reasonable belief standard is that the type of information that you are trying to get through this is the kind of information that would have qualified under the reasonable belief standard as opposed to the reasonable suspicion standard in an MLAT process. Is that what you're trying to explain?