I want to make sure I have it 100% right, because it is so important in this context.
If the request is for basic subscriber information, the test we currently apply under that MLAT process is reasonable grounds. What the superior court judge would want is the reasonable grounds to suspect test. If we were asking for content, it would attract a higher degree of privacy, and they would want the reasonable grounds to believe test. Is that what you're trying to say, or does it all get rolled up into one? How does it work?
What I'm trying to figure out is whether the standard you're using for this is the current standard if that piece was taken out or not.