I understand all of that. I know the process.
What I'm asking you is this. I understand—this is just my opinion—that the changes made create more of a question of subjectivity because now you have fewer black and whites. You have more qualifiers. You have more instructions that you need to evaluate—for example, foreign risk—on a much wider threshold than you did before in order to prevent somebody who immigrated here from a different country from being subject to discriminatory policies. To me, there's more subjectivity, which would mean even more reason that if the RCMP or CSIS is making a recommendation, somebody should not simply be allowed to subvert that without going to a politically accountable person. I'm asking again.