Again, one of the very interesting things about SMRs, which I'm sure this committee has gone into in some detail, is the huge range of applications, from pushing the envelope of an SMR with over 300 megawatts to put on the grid and putting it on a site that's already licensed for nuclear and so on, down to those that are very small. In those, for example, we might deal with some of the very energy-intensive needs of future urban development by having SMRs in that urban development as new SMRs, as the development grows.
If we're going to power electric cars and have connectivity on the scale that advocates are talking about, we'll need electricity, and we'll need lots of it.
I think what's really interesting about SMRs is not that they can replace large nuclear or large baseload power capacity, but that they can find all sorts of different kinds of applications. Those different applications, I think, ought to cause us to ask hard questions about risk and risk perception.