It's a great question.
Maybe I can answer it in a couple of different ways.
First, when we look at the eVinci microreactor technology, for context—I did provide some information and I'll follow up with the committee to ensure that they have their questions answered about the technology itself—it is a five-megawatt nuclear reactor about the size of one sea container for the reactor itself, and then there are one sea container for the I and C equipment and one sea container for the power conversion unit.
The flexibility and luxury we have with the sea container is that it is mobile, so we can take it to sites, leave it at sites and power sites for eight years with 100% non-emitting energy, whether it's electricity or for heat. At the end of the eight years, should they not require another one, the whole unit as is can be taken back, leaving no legacy waste or legacy damage. The eVinci microreactor does not use external water, and the only output there would be would be heat.
To answer your question on the proliferation, I think there was a question there, too, about the fuel itself. The luxury that we have with the eVinci microreactor is that it uses TRISO fuel: tiny pellets encapsulated by a protection barrier. First, that makes it nearly impossible to do anything damaging with it, but the luxury of a microreactor is that the amount of fuel and uranium required is incredibly small, so in terms of any bad actors trying to do something with microreactors or our nuclear battery, they would require thousands of these microreactor sea containers to be able to put it together, and it would be physically and technically impossible to do so.