I think it's a mixture of agency and policies. The gentleman from Axelys talked about how in the U.S. and other places, when you take government money, the IP is immediately assigned to the federal government, as it is in places like Germany. That's a case in which you have a policy at a granting agency so that you've created some appropriation.
I think you naturally have to have an agency, as Ontario has and other provinces are working on, to steward the asset in an expert fashion, as well as provide complementary services. Places like South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Germany, the U.S., Israel and Scandinavia all provide these kinds of services with an expert zone, because small mistakes cause the whole thing to leak out.
It's an unfair system. I say in the tangible economy, if you get it 90% right, you get 90% of the benefits. In the intangible economy, if you get it 90% right, you get 10% of the benefits. It has non-linear leaking structures. That's why it needs to be very technically attended to.