Thanks. That's a really important question.
Yes, from what we can see, there is a greater tendency for both women and other equity-deserving groups to be located in the part-time or contract academic field. I think this is something that's crucial for us to address.
You said there is more equity, but it would be within that group. If we're looking at overall equity, the gap becomes larger and we start to see greater areas for concern if people don't have access to full-time, full-year jobs, which we often refer to as “tenure stream”. We also know that the number of precariously employed academics is increasing.
I think we should also be concerned about what might be a lost opportunity for some young scholars now to fully develop their potential as scholars if they're being increasingly streamed into jobs that allow them to perform only part of what they're trained for. I think this is where the federal government has a very important role to play, working with provinces, in stabilizing the funding to post-secondary education, particularly with a view to renewing the full-time faculty complement.
More than ever, we have what are often referred to as highly qualified personnel, but there's a diverse group of doctorates who are prepared to enter the academy but need the opportunity to get in there. That means creating those positions, allowing them to get in the door and providing research funding that will support them.
This is obviously also going to benefit us all. It will enrich Canada's capacity by diversifying the talent pool that's available. I think this is the moment to do it. We've seen this shift. It's keeping people out who are quite prepared to get in. I'm glad you asked the question.