Evidence of meeting #65 for Science and Research in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was list.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Nipun Vats  Assistant Deputy Minister, Science and Research Sector, Department of Industry
Francis Bilodeau  Associate Deputy Minister, Department of Industry

5:10 p.m.

NDP

Richard Cannings NDP South Okanagan—West Kootenay, BC

If a security agency finds that there's a risk, how do they find out about that? Is it through—

5:10 p.m.

Assistant Deputy Minister, Science and Research Sector, Department of Industry

Dr. Nipun Vats

You might have to ask them, but I'm not sure they'll be able to tell you.

5:10 p.m.

NDP

Richard Cannings NDP South Okanagan—West Kootenay, BC

Yes, I know.

5:10 p.m.

Assistant Deputy Minister, Science and Research Sector, Department of Industry

Dr. Nipun Vats

There can be cases where, with this centre in place and with an improved security posture on campuses, someone may come to them and say, “Is this kind of transaction or behaviour something we should be concerned about or not?”

They could provide some advice on that, but you have to be a little careful. One of the advantages of having that kind of relationship is that you're not sending the wrong kind of signals to researchers, right? I think that having a focal point within an institution that can manage those risks actually means that you're not getting concerns from individual researchers about security agencies that could scattershot around. I think it is about a relationship.

5:15 p.m.

NDP

Richard Cannings NDP South Okanagan—West Kootenay, BC

I think this is important, because we're talking about national security here, which is a federal thing. We're talking about universities, which have a provincial jurisdiction. We have federal funding. There are all of these intersections, but I have the feeling that there's an awful lot of opportunity for researchers to go beyond NSERC or the other tri-councils to get that funding. That's where I think the real risk lies: where they're lured to take funding from agencies abroad that may or may not have the best interest of Canada in mind.

5:15 p.m.

Associate Deputy Minister, Department of Industry

Francis Bilodeau

I take your point, and I think part of that has informed the approach to date. Part of that has had to, from our perspective, be about building the tools and capacity across multiple actors. That's why, for example, there was the new research support fund put in place to build up capacity.

Nipun mentioned that multiple universities are now creating positions within their organizations around research security. That's why we focus on providing guidance, building tools that can then be used by multiple actors and also building a common understanding of the threats, and building at the same time capacity within the Government of Canada through the research security centre.

I think your point that there are multiple potential vectors and we need to enable and support multiple actors in the ecosystem to be able to take a proactive position is the right one.

5:15 p.m.

NDP

Richard Cannings NDP South Okanagan—West Kootenay, BC

Thank you.

5:15 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Lloyd Longfield

If I might just extend that a bit, I've met with a couple of universities myself in my role, as well as some of the U15 German universities. They've hired security people from the national security agencies in both cases.

They were saying that they're looking at “threat basis” versus “country basis”. I think that's an important distinction for the report we're writing, which is focused on China.

Are there any very brief comments? I'm taking a bit of committee time here.

5:15 p.m.

Associate Deputy Minister, Department of Industry

Francis Bilodeau

Our approach has also been around threat basis. That threat basis has a number of factors. They include areas of research and the nature of the actors. We recognize, as well, that threat levels and the nature of threats will evolve, and so will those vectors. Part of the approach has included one around education and one around building in dialogue, building in the groups that are able to exchange and building in capacity across multiple.... Not to box ourselves into individual organizations and individual countries.... It's recognizing those threats evolve and that to be able to respond, we need an ecosystem that is more capable and educated.

5:15 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Lloyd Longfield

Great. Thank you very much.

Thanks to the committee for indulging my prerogative there.

Mr. Perkins, it's over to you for five minutes.

5:15 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Perkins Conservative South Shore—St. Margarets, NS

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Along the lines of what the chair asked, the preference seems to be continuing with some sort of flexible guideline. Is that right?

5:15 p.m.

Associate Deputy Minister, Department of Industry

Francis Bilodeau

The upcoming guidelines will include a list of institutions and a list of sensitive technologies. They're much more precise, but with the capacity to evolve over time.

5:15 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Perkins Conservative South Shore—St. Margarets, NS

However, they're still guidelines. They're not law. My skepticism, of course, is....

I'll give you a couple of examples through the Investment Canada Act and a few other instances.

The minister of industry in 2017 didn't perform a detailed national security review of the takeover of Norsat by Hytera. That company, Hytera, went on, in January 2022, to be banned by President Biden and charged with 21 counts of espionage. Yet, we still had nothing in the industry department about this company, to the point where the RCMP, nine months later, bought sensitive communications equipment from Hytera while they were banned and charged with espionage in the United States. Then, in November 2022, the current Liberal minister ordered three Chinese companies to divest their ownership of three critical minerals companies. However, only three months later, in January, Minister Champagne failed to follow his own guidelines when he fast-tracked the takeover of a Canadian lithium company, Neo Lithium Corp., by a Chinese state-owned mining enterprise. That's where he's got the law.

Does the minister have the power and law now in existing legislation to ban companies from doing business in Canada, as they do in the United States?

5:20 p.m.

Associate Deputy Minister, Department of Industry

Francis Bilodeau

The ICA is a basis of law that would create a power for the minister to prevent investments and acquisitions. This is not the space we're talking about right now.

Obviously, the space of research is one that is multi-jurisdictional. The approach we have—or that is being presented—is one around guidelines anchored to the major lever the federal...has, which is funding for research.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Perkins Conservative South Shore—St. Margarets, NS

Therefore, these are guidelines with no legal teeth.

The minister said, when he made the announcements on research funding, that he didn't control what provinces or universities did, beyond the granting councils.

Has the minister convened a meeting with his provincial counterparts to share with them that they need to stop doing this?

5:20 p.m.

Assistant Deputy Minister, Science and Research Sector, Department of Industry

Dr. Nipun Vats

There has been communication with his counterparts about the policy. He has sent out communication to them. We've also had meetings at the officials level to discuss how we can ensure alignment of policies across the federal and provincial governments.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Perkins Conservative South Shore—St. Margarets, NS

However, he has not told them to stop doing research with Huawei or the Chinese military's research arm.... He has not told the provinces directly to stop doing that, or asked them to tell the universities—which they fund and primarily control—to implement that.

5:20 p.m.

Associate Deputy Minister, Department of Industry

Francis Bilodeau

In February, the ministers of ISED, Public Safety and Health Canada issued a policy statement, which asked the granting councils—our lever—to not fund anything with a researcher who could be affiliated with areas of concern, state-owned enterprises or potentially influenced by military or other state actors, in sensitive research.

The minister has provided guidance in that space.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Perkins Conservative South Shore—St. Margarets, NS

I understand he's done that with the granting councils, but has he brought his provincial counterparts together—those responsible for transfers of money to universities—and asked them to respect those national guidelines and not do business with these entities?

November 20th, 2023 / 5:20 p.m.

Assistant Deputy Minister, Science and Research Sector, Department of Industry

Dr. Nipun Vats

He's called upon them to respond in kind, yes.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Perkins Conservative South Shore—St. Margarets, NS

What does “respond in kind” mean?

5:20 p.m.

Assistant Deputy Minister, Science and Research Sector, Department of Industry

Dr. Nipun Vats

He's pointed to the federal policy and said that provinces should move forward with similar actions.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Perkins Conservative South Shore—St. Margarets, NS

Are they?

5:20 p.m.

Assistant Deputy Minister, Science and Research Sector, Department of Industry

Dr. Nipun Vats

It varies by jurisdiction.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Perkins Conservative South Shore—St. Margarets, NS

Can you provide a report to this committee of what jurisdictions are following them and what jurisdictions aren't?