Qujannamiik.
Just to very quickly follow up on my last line of questioning regarding indigenous traditional knowledge and how some of that knowledge conflicts with science, a specific example in Nunavut is around polar bears. Inuit had managed to conserve polar bears while hunting them and being sustained by them. The knowledge behind science I understand is increasing, but Inuit knowledge is still being ignored to a great extent, resulting in what Inuit are saying now: With the overpopulation of these predators, there has to be no choice but to kill them because of the quota system.
I just wanted to follow up to say how important your words were to say that indigenous traditional knowledge needs to be used, because it is science, and just to really push with this committee, when you're considering science, how traditional knowledge could be used to guide decision-making. There are very direct impacts when indigenous traditional knowledge is not being used.
To get to my conclusion, I want to ask you what your experience is with the Truth and Reconciliation calls to action and whether you know if there are any calls to action around science.