I would argue yes. If you look at the current, ongoing procurement of a new submarine to replace the Victoria class, as an example, a large portion of the focus of that program has been on the industrial technical benefits that Canada can accrue from that program. In contrast, if you look at an ally, let's say Australia, for example, which has many submarine programs like the AUKUS program or the one before it, the attack class, they were very much focused on not having a 100% ITB return. They were actually looking at what the developmental areas were that they could bring into the country from this procurement and leverage their future defence capabilities from that. That's part and parcel of a lot of the better-run countries internationally in this area.
