My third question has two parts.
The first part is that, in your engagement with universities, are you developing blanket IP and security clearance requirements and working through the process? It will be a bit of a change for academics to participate in this research. How are you doing that?
The second part is that as you define “dual-use research”, are you intentionally casting the net wide? I think the United States has done a very good job of that. Medicine, cancer and major outcomes for soldiers have been included under dual use. Likewise, there are their superfund sites for environmental contamination. They've been casting that net quite broadly.
Can you speak to those questions: one, the blanket relationships with the universities in IP and security, and then the second one on how wide you're casting dual use?