My question is about point number five. You say, “the identity of the evaluation committee, comments, opinions, scores assigned to applications for each criterion”. It's for the ones that are awarded and not awarded. Some researchers who might have had a proposal rejected may not want that information out there. They may not want other people to get those ideas and use those ideas somewhere else. There is privacy involved in that.
Also, we need to recognize that when you sign up to be a peer reviewer, you are a volunteer. I think we have to be somewhat respectful of the enormous contribution the scientific and research community makes. If we actually put a dollar value on that time...we're not paying those researchers to do this.
I'm wondering whether your intent is that the names of the evaluators would be on there, and the names of the proposals that aren't funded and those ideas would also be released. I would find that very problematic.