Just briefly, on your first question, with respect to the interim guidelines, this is the challenge that I spoke about earlier, which is that there are so many pieces to the puzzle. As you know, there is a 17-member interdepartmental working group. The analogy I came up with is that it's like having a three-legged race, but it's a 17-person, three-legged race. You're going to go as slowly as the last person who's with you.
The reason I make that analogy is that you have these immigration guidelines, which are designed to do what they can from an immigration perspective, but then you also have law enforcement pieces. Then you have provincial matters with respect to housing and legal aid and these other additional pieces that are really required to get the whole package. A lot of the concerns that are being raised are about the fact that the guidelines don't do enough. Well, they can't. Certainly there are areas in which there are gaps, and they were identified I think quite well by Ms. Isaacs. I think the process of improving on the guidelines is one that should happen once there's been time to see how they work in practice.
I should add that it's been reported in the media that there were six women who were offered the protection of the guidelines already this summer. They decided to turn them down. That, actually, is not necessarily a bad thing. When the media was coming up...before the guidelines, people were saying that anyone could claim to be a trafficking victim and try to cram their way in. That's not happening, and that hasn't happened in other jurisdictions.
Canada should be confident in offering sufficient protection, as required under the international protocols, so that this can be carefully done in a way that will not abuse our country's generosity.