Again, I apologize, because my French is not good enough to answer your questions.
I think you're absolutely right. As I said, we did not get into the reasons why these things happen. Certainly, one of the surprising conclusions we came to in this report was that we did not see a further evolution of the occupational distribution of women. If you go back and look at the period from the mid-1970s to the mid-1990s, you would see a breakdown of what used to be called the old pink ghetto types of jobs, the jobs that women traditionally did. When we say they are traditional, we're talking largely statistically. For example, currently about 75% of all clerical and administrative workers are females, and that's a fairly consistent figure. So when we say traditional jobs, it's jobs in which they have been concentrated.
Yes, if you went back to the Women in Canada report in 1995, the third edition, you would have projected that there would have been a fairly significant change in occupational distribution, given that (a) over the previous two decades, there had been some significant changes in that area, and that (b) you are getting this increase in educational attainment on the part of women. Why over the course of the last decade, it kind of flattened out? That's a question we have to throw to other researchers to try to figure out. But you're absolutely right, yes.