The intent of Ms. Keeper's intervention was that human trafficking is there with the Olympics. We know, we understand, we prepared a report, etc., and we made recommendations to the government.
Generally, in an Olympic environment there is higher activity, so according to the amended plan, we need interdisciplinary intervention from the government and other agencies. The Olympic plan would be far stricter than what we want on a day-to-day basis.
So what Ms. Keeper is suggesting is that if we stick with the original motion, as amended by Ms. Smith, we will be able to have a plan. The plan would be in place during the Olympics, and the amount of resources required to monitor it after the Olympics may be slightly different from the resources required to do it during the Olympics. So the plan will be there.
We're recommending that the plan be there, but the intensity of the plan will be slightly different from the Olympics to normal day-to-day business.