No, I don't need to read it.
I wasn't part of this committee in hearing the witnesses, but my sense is that what is being proposed here is to have a sort of model developed, in terms of a crisis response in a situation that is unusual, extraordinary, and this requires extraordinary measures.
I assume that your report has recommendations for the country and day-to-day life, in terms of these issues, but it seems to me the specific of this is that it would be in response to something extraordinary.
My concern would be that anything that sort of takes it out of the timing of the event sort of waters it down. What you're trying to develop is a crisis response, and you have to sort of stay within that framework of time. That's the way it seems to me.
So I think the wording should just stay.
Thank you.