Evidence of meeting #44 for Status of Women in the 40th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was plan.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Patty Ducharme  National Executive Vice-President, Executive Office, Public Service Alliance of Canada
Annette Marquis  Disabilité Insurance and Pension Officer, Public Service Alliance of Canada

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

Dave Van Kesteren Conservative Chatham-Kent—Essex, ON

I think we're discussing the amendment. I think, first of all, that the motion is excellent. Something has to be done.

When I was in B.C., I drove down the Highway of Tears, I believe they call it, and I know it's a hot topic among many people in that area. I think, Cathy, this has also manifested itself in your riding. I think that's why you brought it out. I think it was just stated that we have to talk about whether we want to have a prolonged discussion or whether we can talk about this just for one session, but it is worthy of our discussion. I think this is a very good motion.

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

You're speaking to the motion; I'm speaking to the amendment.

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

Dave Van Kesteren Conservative Chatham-Kent—Essex, ON

I'm speaking to the motion at this point. I haven't really had time to digest the....

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

All right.

Does anyone else wish to speak to the amendment?

Go ahead, Lise, and then we'll have Irene.

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

Lise Zarac Liberal LaSalle—Émard, QC

This is a very important issue that we all have at heart in this Committee. I believe we need to take the time to do a thorough study, to really consider the issue. Indeed, this would require more than one meeting if we really want to go in depth. If we want to do a proper job, this is what we must do.

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

Go ahead, Irene.

5:05 p.m.

NDP

Irene Mathyssen NDP London—Fanshawe, ON

Thank you, Madam Chair.

I think both the motion and the amendment propose an important discussion, a very critical discussion. I like the idea of adding in women such as Ellen Gabriel, Bev Jacobs, Mavis Erickson, and Sharon McIvor, who experienced violence.

I think it is indeed going to take more than one meeting. It will logically, I think, lead into our discussion about the language change at DFAIT. I want to say to the committee that I am very concerned about the language changes at DFAIT, and I wouldn't want to lose that discussion.

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

I'm sorry; I almost can't hear you. What did you say in that last piece?

5:05 p.m.

NDP

Irene Mathyssen NDP London—Fanshawe, ON

I said that I support this motion and the amendment because the study of violence is very important nationally, but I wouldn't want to lose the discussion in terms of international violence, which was part and parcel of our proposal to look at the language change at DFAIT. I'm saying there needs to be a balance.

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

So you're supporting the amendment.

5:05 p.m.

NDP

Irene Mathyssen NDP London—Fanshawe, ON

Yes, but I don't--

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

And you would have added more to the amendment.

Go ahead, Monsieur Desnoyers.

5:05 p.m.

Bloc

Luc Desnoyers Bloc Rivière-des-Mille-Îles, QC

I shall be brief, Madam Chair.

At one of my first meetings as a member of this Committee, Ms. Demers did indeed raise the frightening number of women who disappear without a trace. She said that we should look into it. I believe that the aboriginal community must be a part of this study in order to set things straight rather than us discussing it among ourselves.

As for the amendment that is proposed, it is obvious that we need the participation of all these people. So I support the motion.

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

Well, actually, we're speaking to the amendment, not to the motion alone.

Ms. Boucher, are you speaking on the amendment or to the motion? It's to the amendment; okay, good.

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

Sylvie Boucher Conservative Beauport—Limoilou, QC

I believe this is important and that everyone here realizes that we must look at this very closely. I fully agree for the very good and simple reason, as Mr. Desnoyers said, that we should not only take our own advice, regardless of our partisan affiliations, but that we should all work together and reach one single perspective. We need a wider perspective in order to find out what is really happening out there. I believe this is very important in order to get a full understanding of what is happening.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

Thank you.

I will call the vote on the amendment.

(Amendment agreed to)

The amendment passes unanimously, so we're looking at a study.

I thought that one of the things we might want to discuss, because we have a little bit of time, is when we will do it. I think we have four more meetings, if I'm not mistaken, on non-traditional work. If we finish that up when we come back in January--it's two weeks' work--we can then move into this. It will have to supersede whatever else we were planning to do in our planning book, and it would be, I think, something we would want to expand on in a study. I don't know how many weeks this will take, but if we were going to bring in all kinds of people, that might mean about four meetings, do you think? Five? I don't know.

Go ahead, Dave.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

Dave Van Kesteren Conservative Chatham-Kent—Essex, ON

I have a suggestion. Can we possibly just have a one-time meeting first, which would be an announcement to the native groups that we are going to look at this, rather than wait for a prolonged period of time, especially now just before Christmas? That would give some real encouragement to those people who are suffering through that time.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

We have to vote on the amended motion.

I was just putting this to you so that when you vote on the amended motion we might want to add something to it in terms of timelines. There is no way, Dave, that we can do this before Christmas.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

Dave Van Kesteren Conservative Chatham-Kent—Essex, ON

I'm not suggesting that we do it. I'm just saying that we have a preliminary meeting that just sets up the parameters, possibly. If we can send a message to those women and to those families that we're going to be doing this, they could have that before the Christmas period as something to reflect on and think about. That would give them some hope.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

That would mean we would have this preliminary meeting before Christmas.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

Dave Van Kesteren Conservative Chatham-Kent—Essex, ON

Yes.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

We don't have time.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

Dave Van Kesteren Conservative Chatham-Kent—Essex, ON

We don't have time for--

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

No, that's what I wanted to talk to you about. We only have three more meetings and we have to talk about the trafficking issue on the Olympics. We also have to deal with the report, which is going to be about 25 pages.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

Dave Van Kesteren Conservative Chatham-Kent—Essex, ON

We can make an announcement before that time. I just--