I'm glad that you mentioned Treasury Board Secretariat, because we had the analysts from Treasury Board here when we looked at GBA. The analysts said that 10 of the 21 Treasury Board submissions that were reviewed were challenged, but TBS couldn't provide any written evidence of that GBA challenge. When we questioned that, they said it's done orally.
The reality is that there has to be accountability and there has to be tracking. It would seem that an oral challenge isn't sufficient; there should be proper documentation with written information.
Do you think that's unreasonable? Would you agree that there should be written and understandable accountability around this issue?