I want to clarify a number of things.
Whenever we talk about funding, we keep saying those are funding cuts. In fact, if you look at the total amount of money for Status of Women for these groups, actually it has been doubled.
If we go back to the original idea of having the study, it's to study the manner in which it is distributed. Right now, we are looking at the redistribution of funds.
If we just look at one side of the picture without looking at the other side as to how it is distributed—those who do not have the funding now and those who now have the funding—if we only look at those who do not have access to the funds, it doesn't tell the whole picture. That is why I think the whole spirit of the motion right now addresses the original purpose of this study, of asking the panellists to come to us. That's why I'm supporting this.