Thank you, Madam Chair.
The first thing I have is a comment. Certainly the G8 initiative is comprehensive. I think it's important to recognize that the WHO definition of family planning does not actually include abortion.
I do find it unfortunate that we keep getting sidetracked. We're here talking about child health, and we keep getting sidetracked back into that issue. Really, we don't want to reopen that debate and we don't want to be doing things that divide Canadians, so in regard to the initial comments in terms of the comprehensive plan, it is a comprehensive plan and it's certainly respecting the WHO definition.
From there, I would like to pick up on the topic of childhood injury. I'm actually struggling a little bit. When you go to these developing countries and you see five or six people, a whole family, on scooters, is it at all practical, or is it something that perhaps shouldn't take a prominent role, and we really should be focusing on maternal and child health, focusing on those interventions in these countries?
I guess that would be to both Dr. Snowdon and Pam Fuselli. How do you see that this might be practical in terms of childhood injury prevention in the particular maternal and child initiative with the G8?