Then what you're suggesting is that you want to stick to the four who did not receive funding and add 15 who did. You realize you're moving away from the concept, in this motion, of equal. You realize that. So that's not a friendly amendment.
We don't have the mover of the motion here. It makes eminent sense to have the mover of the motion to speak; they know exactly what they intended and if they want their intention not to be there or not.
We don't have Madame Boucher here to say whether she agrees to moving away from equal and into what I would consider to be a huge number of people who were funded to a small group of people who were not funded. That certainly isn't equal.
The question I would like to ask the mover is does he mind if it is no longer equal?