Okay, Ms. Neville.
Is there any further discussion on this motion?
No? I'm going to call the question.
I'm going to reread the motion so everybody knows what we're voting for here. We proposed that the original motion be amended to read as follows:
That the Committee, as part of the motion adopted during the meeting on Wednesday, April 28, 2010, invite also as witnesses for the meeting of Wednesday, May 26, 2010 three groups from each of the five funding regions (National; Atlantic; Quebec and Nunavut; Ontario; West; Northwest Territories and Yukon) to be chosen by the Committee from the total list of 78 groups that received funding in 2009-2010 through Status of Women Canada-Women's Community Fund, as the Committee is inviting groups who did not receive funding during the same fiscal year through the fund.
Those in favour of that motion?
Those opposed?
I guess I will have to break the tie.
I always try to tell this committee why I'm voting the way I'm voting. I actually could have supported--very much so, because I thought it was fair--the original motion, which said “equal”. I think if you have 15 people who received funding and you happen to have five people who did not receive funding, it's an unfair grouping of people. I think it should be equal.
So I cannot vote for this motion.
(Motion negatived)
There's a motion to adjourn?
Thank you, Mr. Calandra...