I know. I have another question. It's an important question, and it has to do with connecting financial abuse and poverty.
The reality is that right now in this country there are 154,000 senior women who live below the poverty line. There are all kinds of reasons. They were caregivers. They had part-time jobs or intermittent work. They couldn't contribute to their pensions.
OAS and GIS are fine, but what the government provided was less than half of what's needed to lift all of these women out of poverty, so it seems that we need some kind of pension reform. We need to make sure that women are not made vulnerable and subject to abuse because they have inadequate resources in terms of their incomes.
Does that make sense to you that we need to attack—or address, more accurately—the fact that women live below the poverty line? Private pensions are failing, and we just don't provide enough through the public pension plan yet.
Whoever would like to answer is fine.