So the 25% threshold was deemed appropriate in this particular case.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
The reason I raised that was because, of course, we heard from the Iroquois Caucus that there were some concerns raised because this is dealing with matrimonial real property on reserve. They said there may be challenges with having off-reserve members who have no interest in the property, although sometimes off-reserve members do still have certificates of possession. Because of the complexity of the land claim, they may not occupy the land but still have that certification of possession. There were concerns raised with that threshold on the eligibility, so I wanted to clarify that.
Thank you, Madam Chair.