One of them, as I've said, is defining it as a leadership issue. If you define it as a leadership issue, that's a positive thing. They won't feel they're being blamed, in a sense, but they're being challenged in a positive way. If it's framed as a leadership issue, a lot of men can hear what you're saying and join in.
Over time it becomes an expectation, not a hope. In other words, we're not hoping that men will join us, if you will. We're saying we expect you to join us. If you're a person who's a leader in your faith community, in your business community, in labour, in politics, in sports, in education, in your family, by definition you need to be knowledgeable about and engaged with these issues. When that is said to men, I think a lot of men can hear that.
I've worked with men for a long time. I've done a lot of leadership breakfasts in Canada, in various provinces, where men come together from various sectors of the community, men who are not already involved, typically, in domestic violence or sexual assault issues. Business leaders, labour leaders, sports figures, and others come to these breakfasts. The theme of the breakfast is that everybody in the community has a role to play.
We know that not all of these guys are going to become activists. We understand that, of course, but they are members of the community, and they can play supportive roles. Sometimes it means writing a cheque and supporting a program, but other times there are other forms of support people can give. A lot of men haven't even thought about what role they can play. As I've said, a lot of men think that if they themselves don't engage in these behaviours and they don't teach their sons to engage in them, they shouldn't be involved. We have to make the case that we have to be involved because these are community issues. Gender equity and the prevention of gender violence are imperatives in a civilized society, and you have to be part of that.
Ma'am, can I say one other piece?