If you're referring to, say, a cabinet position or a parliamentary secretary position, which I think is what you're alluding to, then, yes, just as there are unqualified men who shouldn't be cabinet ministers or parliamentary secretaries.
I firmly believe in a merit-based system and and that we have the best person for the position, again, regardless of gender. I acknowledge the fact that women may have to work harder to get equal recognition among their peers in some cases, but I feel that in many cases...especially with the women we have now in the House. We have women with fantastic resumés and incredible backgrounds who can earn those positions in cabinet and parliamentary secretary positions, based solely on merit. That is very easy to distinguish.
Of course, there are people who shouldn't be cabinet ministers or parliamentary secretaries—those who don't necessarily have the qualifications, or the resumés that would qualify them for the position. If we give those people positions based on their gender, then we're diminishing the merit of people who are perhaps in a better situation to earn and have those positions.