Evidence of meeting #14 for Status of Women in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was gba.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Rosalind Cavaghan  Post Doctoral Fellow, Department of Political Science, Radboud University, As an Individual
Dorienne Rowan-Campbell  As an Individual
Cindy Hanson  Associate Professor, Adult Education, University of Regina and President Elect, Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women (CRIAW), As an Individual
Olena Hankivsky  Professor, School of Public Policy, Simon Fraser University, As an Individual
Clerk of the Committee  Ms. Andrea McCaffrey

5:25 p.m.

NDP

Sheila Malcolmson NDP Nanaimo—Ladysmith, BC

Thank you very much.

5:25 p.m.

Post Doctoral Fellow, Department of Political Science, Radboud University, As an Individual

Dr. Rosalind Cavaghan

I could jump in if there is time. You were talking about budgetary decisions and infrastructure. If you were to include gendered knowledge of economic policy, you would have a different notion of investment, including investment in the care economy and an awareness of the downward pressures from the state cutting back on welfare policies and social services. That has an impact on women's incomes. It certainly hits women of lower social class, and in Europe, of different ethnic minorities. The differences are very significant, but if you don't do any kind of gendered analysis of your economic policy, all of that just goes completely unnoticed.

5:25 p.m.

NDP

Sheila Malcolmson NDP Nanaimo—Ladysmith, BC

Ms. Rowan-Campbell, is there anything to add from your side?

5:25 p.m.

As an Individual

Dorienne Rowan-Campbell

I would say that one of the initiatives we took from Canada to the world and developing countries was really looking at women, motherhood, safety, and welfare. But it was taken completely out of the context of all of the factors that really affect women, such as getting pregnant, going through pregnancy, prenatal care, aftercare, and the need for work. It focused on one very tiny aspect of women's lives, and I think it was not as effective as it might have been had gender analysis of the program been undertaken before it was initiated.

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Marilyn Gladu

Thank you so much.

I want to thank Dr. Hankivsky, Dr. Hanson, Dr. Cavaghan, and Ms. Rowan-Campbell for joining us today. Your intelligence and experience in this area have been most helpful to us.

For the committee members, I will excite you by telling you that on Tuesday we will have visitors with us, remotely from New Zealand and Belgium, so we'll be able to hear what's going on in those places in the world—and potentially, Health Canada as well. Unfortunately, the Department of Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces were not available to meet with us, but we'll have an exciting day Tuesday. On Thursday we will begin to draft the report, so start writing your ideas down.

Thanks so much for your attention today.

5:30 p.m.

NDP

Sheila Malcolmson NDP Nanaimo—Ladysmith, BC

Madam Chair, what reason was given by the witnesses who refused our invitation?

5:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Marilyn Gladu

I will ask the clerk to respond.

5:30 p.m.

The Clerk of the Committee Ms. Andrea McCaffrey

Mostly, it had to do with scheduling conflicts. Their expert witnesses were unavailable until after our deadline for this report; so, unfortunately, they are not able to attend.

5:30 p.m.

NDP

Sheila Malcolmson NDP Nanaimo—Ladysmith, BC

That is unfortunate.

5:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Marilyn Gladu

Yes, it is.

See you on Tuesday.

This meeting is adjourned.