I think that, unfortunately, sometimes we still think of a breadwinner model, when in fact what we've seen is that most rich economies have moved towards a two-earner model. The question then is, how does one facilitate that, in terms of all of those other needs that need to be taken care of? The daily needs of feeding people, of clothing them, and of teaching them. I think that is the dimension we have to get into the picture. We have to first of all recognize that that's a key dimension, and that women do that more than men, and then that forecloses a whole series of options, which as Janet said, may skew them much more into lower paid work, often care work. I think that's a barrier we could address through various means.
It's very interesting. Ontario is now doing this minimum income study, and it'll be interesting to see the results. I know that from the Manitoba results, the effect of the policy was to encourage more young women to stay at home with their children, and the effect on young men was to encourage them to go into education, to improve their education. I think we have to trace those kinds of incentives to see whether they are serving men versus women in the long term.