Ms. Lomax, you mentioned—and I think the witnesses from Elizabeth Fry piggybacked on this as well—the CSC guidelines dealing with the exclusion of serious mental illness and the problematic definition that essentially allows them to put a person in administrative segregation by another name. What is the problem with the definition? More importantly, how do we fix it so that we're not dealing with this problem that just seems to perpetuate segregation?
On February 1st, 2018. See this statement in context.