Afeas introduced invisible work day to the public in 2001, 20 years ago. Our aim was really to increase awareness among citizens and decision-makers. It was in the wake of that move that Ms. Demers introduced a motion in the House of Commons in 2010 requesting that the day be created. A Conservative government was in power at the time, and no action was taken on the motion. That's often the case with motions.
That's why we aren't requesting a motion, but rather a bill or an order. Our purpose is really to establish this day. This is consistent with the international commitments Canada has made to recognize this kind of work since 1975. Canada has made a commitment to it. So the idea is to take one more step toward making this work visible by establishing a national day, across Canada, as has been done, for example, with the National Day of Remembrance and Action on Violence against Women, which was established following the Polytechnique tragedy and which occurs on December 6. Other days have been created as well.
I saw that, in one of your reports, your committee called for a day against human trafficking to be created, on February 22, I think. I saw that a few days ago. One could say that these are critically important days. They help fix in people's minds that these issues are important. This compels the government in power, whatever it may be, to highlight those days and to do so every year. As a consequence of this, Statistics Canada should provide us, generally every five years, and during the five years between censuses, with data on unpaid work via the General Social Survey, particularly under the heading of time use.
The data should also indicate the number of hours worked by a given number of individuals in a given age group in Quebec, British Columbia or elsewhere in the country. It should also indicate the monetary value of that work. In addition to hours worked, it should also show direct and indirect costs. As noted in our brief, it should also indicate income that caregivers have foregone. One of the witnesses—I believe it was Ms. Coupal—also discussed direct costs, such as where the caregiver is required to pay rent for the person cared for, as well as the costs associated with that person's transportation, activities, diapers or, if that person is bedridden, support pillows and so on. All that involves costs, and many caregivers face costs of up to $6,000 per year in performing this work. Some pay more.
This is important. I would say it creates an additional moral obligation for government to gather and report this information. Groups such as ours, which are engaged in an effort to have this necessity recognized, rely on the data that Statistics Canada provides. We can't do that work because it's too costly. We can't commission Statistics Canada to do it because we would have to pay for it. It's truly up to the government to shed light on the situation rather than allow unpaid work to remain invisible, as it still is.
It is time to include it in GDP, as is everywhere the case of business, commerce and institutions. It has to be important and recognized. The pandemic and all it has brought in its wake prove that it is time to take action and promptly address this question.
The study you are conducting today is proof of that.