Yes, thank you, Chair.
I want to first thank my colleague for bringing this motion forward.
I have visited the mother-child program twice at Grand Valley. At Buffalo Sage, the former executive director there said that all women benefit from the children who are part of the program when it's running. They also have a program at the Edmonton Institution for Women, which I am incredibly supportive of.
I do find disturbing the click factory put out on social media just to generate outrage about the program with comments like it was “shocking”. CSC runs a lot of programs and this is probably one of the best ones they run. Mother-child programs are run in the U.S., India, Kenya, Argentina and Norway.
Most of the women who are in prison are young and are single mothers. In fact, 70% of federally sentenced women are mothers to children under the age of 18. Two-thirds of those mothers are the primary or sole caregivers of their children.
Indigenous women, as my colleague mentioned, are grossly overrepresented in federal corrections. They make up only 4% of the Canadian population, but they represent 41% of all female admissions to federal custody. However, I would note that if you go out west, that number probably rises to 85 to 90%. At Grand Valley, two of the moms whom I met were actually from the west, but we've run out of room in our prisons out west so they were sent to Grand Valley. It's probably one of the best programs that CSC runs.
Just for the record, Chair, the conditions to be part of the program are that the moms are classified as minimum or medium security; that they've been screened against the relevant provincial child welfare registries to verify whether information exists that should be considered in the decision-making process; that the child welfare agency is supportive of their participation, and there's no current assessment from a mental health professional indicating that the mother is incapable of caring—