On the other question, Madam Redsky, you talked about the IBAs. Earlier, you mentioned the example about Quebec to my colleague.
I'm part of Sudbury, and the mining community for decades talked about IBAs and how important those agreements are, but I don't think that a lot of the IBAs, especially in the past, focused on social determinants or looking at housing or looking specifically at violence against women. I'm wondering if you have any examples.
How do you feel about the recommendations by the federal government that we should be looking at funding organizations to provide education to resource bases, like MAC, for the mining industry, and COSIA, for the oil and gas, so that they then could educate their private sector members, to make sure that in impact benefit agreements there are criteria set?
What role do you see for the federal government? A lot of these agreements are negotiated with local chiefs—who, sadly, are probably men—and councils. Do you feel that the role of the federal government should be to provide that leadership to try to educate the associations so that they then could educate their members?