Sure. I have to first say that I am not a policy person. I understand policy only to spell it, but if we really think of the lens.... In research we talk about lenses, about how we approach our work, and there are different lenses to how we engage with our study. For example, as a sociologist, I read the world differently from the way that a quantitative person would.
If we trace back to see why sports is in the Heritage Canada portfolio, we will see that it stems back to a failed Olympic run when the men's ice hockey team didn't achieve gold medals. Therefore, now we need to invest in this national idea that ice hockey is “our” game, “our” sport, which again overrides our indigenous history with respect to those sports that have been here before us.
When you think about the lens that sports is viewed through from a funding or whichever sort of lens, having it within Heritage Canada raises red flags, because what are we promoting as Canadian heritage?