Also, it would remove, for example, the reference to a “timely” order. The challenge with that is that it's not a defined term and there's significant variability, depending on the Canadian jurisdiction in which a peace bond is being sought, in terms of how long it takes, so it might be challenging in terms of implementation. It's not included, but obviously I think the courts are aware that time is a consideration in this. It's an ongoing challenge in courts.
The other thing is that if we're varying conditions, as with some of the other peace bonds, it allows the intimate partner or the Attorney General, if the informant is not the intimate partner, to ask for the conditions to be varied. That could be important, for example, if you have a new custody arrangement and there's a requirement that you need to communicate over transfer of the kids and that sort of thing. The benefit of that is that you can align and adjust as required, depending on the situation of the family.