Obviously, distance can be significant. However, I want to come back to the idea of removing proposed paragraph 810.03(7)(f) concerning the use of social media. According to the wording used, particularly in subsection 810.03(7) on page 3, the jurist or judge could still decide to impose this condition if it's considered desirable. That's my understanding.
As a result, if paragraph 810.03(7)(f) is removed, judges can still impose this condition if it's considered desirable or if the case truly requires it. Is that right? Since I just heard otherwise, I don't know anymore.