I'm sorry about that. I know we're getting right to the end.
Lisa, thanks for that intervention.
At the same time, there is one thing. Maybe I've just read too many James Patterson novels or something. When it states, “fears on reasonable grounds that another person”.... That's why I want to get into this.
I'm looking at the time. We may have to talk about this on Thursday.
Could “another person” mean...? I don't know. Maybe someone is hired to kill somebody. That's some of my thought about this, because we were looking at that relationship with intimate partners. Specifically, in this clause, “another person”.... I recognize that we need things close, but the way I'm reading it seems extraordinarily broad, because that other person may not be the intimate partner.
Perhaps you could give me clarification on that. As I said, it's kind of cherry-picking. As you know, everybody cherry-picks. I'm just looking at whether people get something like this. Could there be any issues with “another person” when we're talking about intimate partners specifically?